True neutral anteroposterior and lateral facial views were selected if the photograph met the following criteria 4: If we did not find the optimal photographs for analysis, we captured photographs from the video clips from Internet websites. All photographs were searched from Internet Websites and stored in a computer as JPG files using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, Calif.). A retrospective review of the photographs of Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe from 2001 to 2015 was conducted. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine. The objective of this study was to analyze the facial proportions of the most beautiful women in the 21st century based on the winners of Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe and compare their facial proportions with those of neoclassical canons and facial golden ratios. The Miss Universe contest is known to be the paramount beauty contest and its winner is considered the most beautiful woman in the world. Moreover, standard references of facial proportions were analyzed in ancient normal populations, but modern facial proportions of the most beautiful women in the 21st century have never been investigated. However, perception of facial attractiveness has changed over time. 3ĭefinition of the ideal facial proportions of beauty has been attempted since the ancient times, with neoclassical canons and facial golden ratios being the most referenced. Although facial attractiveness has been thought to be based on individual taste, culture, popular trend, and sex difference, 1, 2 according to a hypothesis, in a harmonious face, certain fixed ratios exist between different parameters. Furthermore, facial golden ratios were statistically significantly invalid in modern facial proportions of beauty.Īdvances in plastic surgery can make incredible facial change including soft tissue and skeletal profiles. Photogrammetic analysis demonstrated longer forehead, thinner lower-upper lip height proportion, wider interala-medial canthus width proportion, and wider nasofrontal angle compared with previous references. Modern facial proportions of beauty are different from the past. Of the 16 facial golden ratios, 12 demonstrated statistical significance in both the Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe groups. Seven points of facial analysis were found to be statistically significant between Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe groups. Miss Universe showed wider nasofrontal and nasofacial angle, more nasal tip projection, and thinner lower-upper lip height ratio. Ten points of facial proportions were found to be statistically significant between Miss Universe and neoclassical canons. Miss Universe Thailand showed wider nasofrontal angle, thinner lower-upper lip height ratio, and less chin projection. Nine points of facial proportions were found to be statistically significant between Miss Universe Thailand and neoclassical canons. Sixteen Miss Universe Thailand and 16 Miss Universe were included. Comparisons of the facial proportion among Miss Universe Thailand, Miss Universe, neoclassical canons, and facial golden ratios were performed. Twenty-six dominant points were identified. All photographs were searched from Internet websites. Methods:Ī retrospective review of the photographs of Miss Universe Thailand and Miss Universe from 2001 to 2015 was conducted. However, modern facial proportions of the most beautiful women in the 21st century are unavailable and have never been determined. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.Īn ideal facial proportion has been attempted since the ancient times. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the authors.Ĭhairat Burusapat, FRCST, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Thung Phayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand, E-mail: Registration Number: TCTR20170104002 Date registered: 2 January 2017.ĭisclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. Trial database registered: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) (Member of WHO Registry Network). Received for publication Septemaccepted October 10, 2018. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |