MOUs set out what should happen but did not necessarily lay out a path to get there.Ī key implication of this work is that MOUs between Head Start programs and LEAs may not be meeting their full potential in aligning and supporting the implementation of cross-system transition strategies. The MOUs studied did not outline specific details, procedures, processes-rather they set high-level policy goals. It could also suggest that programs and LEAs receive stronger legal guidance regarding children with disabilities. This may suggest that Head Start programs and LEAs view transition activities pertaining to children with disabilities as more important to spell out explicitly in MOUs than transition activities pertaining to Head Start-enrolled children generally. The federal policy explicitly mentioned the most was the IDEA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |